Many in the press and Dr. Fauci himself have been downplaying or dismissing the role of natural immunity. This Israeli study supports what the so-called conspiracy theory doctors have been saying all along. Natural immunity is durable and long-lasting. The question is why Dr. Fauci is asking people to suspend common sense.
FDA's long-serving Marion Gruber and Phil Krause felt it necessary to resign their positions while under pressure to greenlight a COVID booster shot. Their reasoning was published in the Lancet. The voices of reason are either getting fired or quitting in protest, leaving only the Peoples Temple true believers in charge. God help us.
Zoologist Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance seems to be neck-deep in doing and attempting to do what Dr. Fauci claims EcoHealth is not doing. This proposal to DARPA was rejected because of its dangerous nature and was deemed potentially GoF (Gain of Function) research.
It is becoming increasingly difficult to imagine that the EcoHealth Alliance was not responsible for creating SARS-CoV-2.
If you thought shedding was a conspiracy theory, think again. This document from the FDA outlines design criteria for shedding studies. Shedding is the transmission of treatment from a treated individual to an untreated individual.
This copy of the research grant to the EcoHealth Alliance ties it to the possible lab creation of the SARS CoV 2 virus. It looks like Dr. Fauci lied about funding gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Call it what you want, A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
This technical briefing shows (on page 20) that 722 unvaccinated and 1622 fully vaccinated people died of the Delta variant from Feb 1st, 2021, to Sept 12th, 2021 in England. It looks like not only do vaccinated people spread the virus as readily as the unvaccinated, but it does also not even protect them from death as was the claim. Am I missing something? And with results like these and unknown long-term outcomes, can someone please explain to me why anyone mandates this vaccine?
Yet another study supports the safety and effectiveness of ivermectin. Since it is off-patent, I don’t expect this drug to be FDA approve for the early treatment of SARS-CoV-2 anytime soon, however. Apparently, it is all about making money, not saving lives. I don’t know what other explanation there could be.
This FDA draft PowerPoint of possible adverse events was accidentally leaked in a video conference. It might help explain why Marion Gruber, director of the Office of Vaccines Research & Review (OVRR), and Phil Krause, OVRR deputy director left the FDA when pressured to speed up the approval process.
If SARS-CoV-2 was created in a lab, which is increasingly looking like it is the case, this paper might well describe how an existing virus was manipulated to develop SARS-CoV-2.
The SPARS Pandemic 2025 – 2028 was written in October of 2017. It is a bit astonishing how predictive this document as been. It helps explain why some "conspiracy" oriented individuals have labeled it a plandemic.
This article appeared in TheScientist on Nov 16, 2015. Lab-Made Coronavirus is in the article's title, yet on March 11, 2020, the publication felt it necessary to tag the article with this.
Update (March 11, 2020): On social media and news outlets, a theory has circulated that the Coronavirus at the root of the COVID-19 outbreak originated in a research lab. Scientists say there is no evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus escaped from a lab.The pandemic had just started, no serious investigation had been made, and yet these "no evidence the virus escaped from a lob' warning labels began appearing everywhere. It reminds me of a Simpsons episode where Bart says, "I didn't do it, nobody saw me."
Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death. Pharmaceutical companies can only be sued for a vaccine injury if the ‘side effect’ is not listed on the vaccine insert. Before receiving a vaccine, read the insert, so you are aware of the risks. It is worth noting that emergency use vaccines are not required to list side effects.
It is worth noting that the author presupposes a zoonotic origin of covid-19; the author states that all variations are human to human in nature, and there is no evidence of new infections coming from an animal reservoir at it origin. In my view, this very lack of evidence for a zoonotic origin or reservoir bolsters the lab-created argument.
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, I suggested that the best thing to do was follow the Swede's initial strategy of just letting the virus pass through the population. Also, using early treatment methods as recommended by Dr. Peter McCullough made sense as well.
This study supports my long-held belief that because of the nature of Corona Viruses, the long-term effectiveness of a vaccine would be futile and probably only make things worse.
My reading of this study is that we have created a worst-case scenario with both a high vaccination rate and a high transmission rate. It makes you wonder if our health officials at the NIH and CDC are just stupid or have a nefarious agenda. I'm currently giving them the benefit of the doubt and assuming that they are just that stupid.
If I am the stupid one, please reach out and educate me. I could be wrong.
Answers to Common Questions About COVID-19 Vaccines and Blood, Platelet or Plasma Donation Eligibility. It is interesting to note that antibodies from covid infected individuals are different from individuals who have receive the vaccine.
The regulator did not require Pfizer to do a biodistribution study of the vaccine lipid nanoparticles because it was assumed that lipid nanoparticles (LNP) from the injection would remain in the deltoid muscle region.
This leaked document from Japan marked ‘PFIZER CONFIDENTIAL’ shows that Pfizer’s internal investigation into the matter tells a very different story. According to this document, lipid nanoparticles (LNP) are widely distributed through the body. Sounds ‘problematic’ to me. More to come.
Self-disseminating sterilizing vaccines for small mammal control, what could go wrong. How long till a human mammal sterilizing vaccine is created? Or how do we know one has not already been made and is this what Bill Gates was talking about when he said the next pandemic would be much worse?
If you are prone to thinking that Dr. Fauci has committed crimes against humanity, then this document written by Dr. David E. Martin is for you. If you believe Dr. Fauci is a saint who is simply trying to save the world, then look away, look away, look away, Dixie Land.
When the jack-booted thugs come pounding on your door demanding you take a vaccine and you don’t want to, then I would pull the Nuremberg Code. Read and print the code and have it ready if it comes to that.
Personally, I would have taken the vaccine if the following criteria had been met:
It would never occur to me to make a criteria list before getting a vaccination in normal times. However, since these are not normal times, I have no plan to get the vaccine. Besides, I already had COVID-19, and natural immunity is vastly better than vaccine induce immunity studies show. If you have come to a similar conclusion and feel alone, remember that PHDs are among the most vaccine-hesitant group, and there is a good reason for it.
Yes, I am not a virologist, but after coming across this study, I could not help but wonder if repeated COVID-19 booster shots might lead to immune exhaustion. Could the immune system come to view booster shots as a chronic infection and react accordingly? And again, this may be wild speculation on my part, but if someone can tell me why repeated booster shots should not raise red flags, let me know. The problem is, I am not convinced virologists know the answer to the question.
At the very least, it would be nice to have some long-term data before forcing booster shots on the entire population. Am I an irrational nut job for asking such a question? Let me know.
It looks like Lymphocytopenia is a significant risk factor in developing critical COVID-19, according to this study. Add that to age and obesity. Lymphocytes are a type of white blood cell in the immune system, and Lymphocytopenia is a condition of having abnormally low levels of lymphocytes.
So does it make sense to have a blood test done to see if you have an underlining condition that may be treatable that would help you fight off SARS-CoV-2 more effectively if you encounter it? My laymen’s brain says yeah, it probably would make sense if you worried about it. It seems to me, having a baseline to measure against is a good idea anyway.
The DOD (Department of Defense) has tracked the vaccine's effectiveness using medicare data and has produced some interesting data. 80% of people >= 65 have been fully vaccinated, yet the vaccinated represent 71% of the Delta variant cases and 60% of the hospitalizations.
If that news were not bad enough, it was also found that whatever effectiveness the vaccine(s) do have wanes over time, and we are not talking about years; we are talking about months.
According to the provided risk model, people at the lowest risk of developing COVID-19 are (drum roll), who have already had COVID-19 and have achieved natural immunity.
It appears that nearly everyone will be exposed to SARS-CoV-2 at some point and vaccinated or not; it will be natural immunity that saves the day. Some of us are not surprised and have been saying that all along. But does Dr. Fauci or the CDC say anything about bolstering natural immunity? Nope, and I sure would like to know why. Let me know what your theories are.
In a nutshell, the durability of the vaccine is the lowest among the two groups that need vaccine protection the most, the old and the immune-compromised. As a result, these two groups will need booster shots and probably often to reduce breakthrough infections. Those who have the most durable, long-lasting protection already had COVID-19—Gee, big surprise there.
What I am getting out of this is the best protection against COVID-19 is to have already had COVID-19 unless you belong to an at-risk population, in which case you may not survive COVID-19 and will need booster shots for the rest of your life or until a better treatment comes along.
So why are young, healthy people getting the vaccine again?
This must-read Toxicology Report highlights 16 adverse effects from the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and how adverse effects, including deaths, are underreported in VAERS. It also describes how the CDC adjusted sensitivity of the PCR test was upped during the ramp-up phase (resulting in 50% false positives to make the pandemic look worse than it was) of the pandemic but then turned down during the vaccination phase (to hide breakout infections from the vaccines).
Section 3 gives a good summary of the 16 identified adverse effects. I believe number 4 perfectly describes what happened to my relative that caused her death, and it perfectly describes what Dr. Charles Hoffe said was happening to his patients.
It is hard to read this study and understand why they CDC and FDA want to vaccinate children, given the long-term risks and the lack of long-term data. I can think of only three possibilities.
Yet another study supporting early treatment of COVID-19.