Videos / Interviews

I am amazed at how many people with stellar credentials are speaking out against the CDC, FDA, and NIH regarding the handling of SAR-CoV-2 with little to gain and a lot to lose. I recommend starting this small sampling with Drs. Peter McCullough, David Relman, and Michael Yeadon.
Dr. Peter Breggin - Psychiatrist

It is "fascinating" to see how many accomplished Harvard graduates are jumping on the "conspiracy" bandwagon. Dr. Peter Breggin makes the case that the vaccine passport is all part of a plan for a globalist government outside of democracy and a way to enrich billionaires.

Dr. Breggin also says the CDC is vastly under-reporting adverse effects and death from the vaccines. Dr. Breggin points out that vaccines do not prevent transmission and, at best, result in fewer hospitalization in the absence of early treatment but, at worse, are far more dangerous than covid-19. I saw what happened to my relative after getting the vaccine, so I can not rule any of this out.

I plan to read his book, ‘Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey’ when it is released before forming an opinion.

Dr. Francis Boyle - Professor of international law

Harvard educated Francis Boyle is a human rights lawyer and professor of international law. He is the author of the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. Professor Boyle believed that SAR-Cov-2 was a lab-created virus and meets the definition of a bioweapon as outline in the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989.

Professor Boyle points out that the mRNA vaccines are an experimental drug and any mandate to take the vaccine violates the Nuremberg code, which was established in 1947 when Nazi doctors were put on trial. It is also worth noting that the now approved Comirnaty by Pfizer is not what is administered to the public at this time.

Excerpt from the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989
Any microorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product that may be engineered as a result of biotechnology, or any naturally occurring or bioengineered component of any such microorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product, capable of causing death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind or deleterious alteration of the environment

Dr Dolores Cahill - Ph.D in psychology

Professor Dolores Cahill is (or at least was) a professor of immunology and molecular biology who promotes early treatment of COVID-19 and believes the mRNA technology is flawed. I have taken no position on her views but find that she raises questions worth considering.

For the record, I try to remain skeptical of all points of view, not just the views of the CDC and NIH. In time, what is true should become evident though it may take a very long time.

I included her post to show again how anyone who questions the narrative promoted by the CDC and or NIH is disappeared from YouTube and Twitter. The free and open debate which ‘was’ the hallmark of free and open societies appears to be a thing of the past.

Since her videos no longer exist on YouTube, I have linked to one of her videos on Rumble. The link to where she holds/held her professorship at Dublin University is now dead, but I have left the link in place to show how people are being ‘disappeared’ for having views contrary to the CDC or NIH. I’m trying to think how the west is any different from communist China at this point. The link was working in early Sept of 2021, by the way.

Dr Peter Daszak - Zoologist

Dr. Peter Daszak is the president of EcoAlliance, which funded 'research' at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Many suspect this research may have been the origin of Covid-19 and was a lab creation. If you watch the video clip and read the wiki, you will probably notice a small problem. The man who potentially funded the creation of the virus was sent by the WHO to find the origin. It should not surprise you that the source of the virus has still not been identified.

This video is a clip of Peter Daszak talking about what certainly sounds like gain of function research to me.

Wiki Except
Prior to the pandemic, Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance were the only U.S.-based organization researching coronavirus evolution and transmission in China,[25] where they partnered with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, among others. On 1 April 2020, following the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, the USAID granted $2.26 million to the EcoHealth program for a six-month emergency extension of the program whose funding has expired in September 2019.[

Video Excerpt
Coronavirus is pretty good; you can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily. The spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus zoologic risk, So you can get the sequence, you can build the protein, we work with Ralph Barrak at UNC to do this. Insert it into the backbone of another virus and do some work in the lab.

Dr Robert Epstein - Ph.D. in psychology

Robert Epstein earned his Ph.D. in psychology at Harvard University. Dr. Epstein has done extensive research on how Google can manipulate opinion without the public's awareness. While Dr. Epstein leans on the left side of the political spectrum, he insists that his work is nonpartisan. I found his testimony to be highly credible.

While Dr. Epstein's testimony was about the potential for meddling in the 2020 election, what is relevant is the power that platforms like Google have to sway public opinion without their even knowing it. To be clear, I am not making any commentary about the 2020 election results; I am only pointing out Google's power.

I believe that Google uses the techniques described by Dr. Epstein to manipulate the public view on a host of topics, including the early treatment of COVID-19. To me, this seems obvious given that take videos down that they do not agree with. So much for free speech.

Dr. Anthony Fauci

A few things I have noticed about Dr. Fauci’s and his body language in this clip. When Fauci is about to tell a preplanned lie, he does a mini swagger movement in his chair, kind of like, I got this. He then dismisses the lab theory and claims the virus would have become well adapted to humans in the one month before being detected. I can’t help but wonder why Mr. believer in science is so eager to embrace the natural origin theory with ZERO evidence. Is that how science is supposed to work, come to a conclusion without proof?

My final impression is he ends his lie with what is referred to as dupers delight. Notice the slight smile at the end of the clip, as if to say, man, I am smart, I fooled them again. In my view, his actions are consistent with a person who knows the virus was lab-made. He also knows that he is, at the very least, indirectly culpable; otherwise, he would not be so eager to accept the natural origin theory with ZERO evidence.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich - Lawyer

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a German Lawyer who successfully sued Deutsche Bank and Volkswagen. Volkswagen was ordered to pay a $2.8 billion criminal fine for "rigging" diesel-powered vehicles to pass emission tests.

Dr. Fuellmich is now assembling an international team of lawyers to create what he hopes will be Nuremberg 2.0 trials for crimes against humanity relating to Covid-19.

Video Except:

This video is just one of over a hundred interviews Reiner Fuellmich has conducted as he prepares his case for crimes against humanity.

Prof. Mattias Desmet posits that mass formation is the same as mass hypnosis. For mass formation to occur, he following conditions must exist. Profoundly important insights are provided in my view.

  1. Lack of sense-making
  2. Lack of social bonds
  3. Free-floating anxiety
  4. Free-floating discontent

The professor explains that what happened in Nazi Germany is the same thing that is happening today around the Covid-19 hysteria.

The Origins of Totalitarianism is recommended reading by the professor.

Galileo Galilei - Father of modern science

Galileo Galilei's book Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (1632) supported the Copernican idea that the Earth rotates and revolves around the sun. The Catholic church did not admit that Galio was correct until October 31, 1992, 360 years later.

I added this entry to be a bit facetious. Still, the internet censorship around vaccines makes you wonder if we have moved into a new version of the Roman Inquisition, where the vaccine has become a new religion. Those who question the vaccine are the new heretics.

Dr. Simone Gold - Emergency physician & Stanford trained Lawyer

This four-part series with Dr. Simone Gold covers a wide range of topics related to the Corona Virus. While she has been savaged in the press as a quack and is widely censored, I don’t understand why. My sense is she asks many valid questions. Since when does asking questions get you banned or cause you to lose your job. Even if she is wrong about everything (and I don’t think she is. at least not about everything), a free society required that she be allowed to speak. I can’t even believe I have to write this.

Dr. Steven R. Gundry - cardiothoracic surgery, medicine, nutrition

I included this video partly because the video has aged well in my view. Dr Gundry points out that we are social animals and makes a case against draconian lockdowns without coming out and saying it. Also, from the very start of the pandemic, Dr. Gundry stressed the importance of good immune health which has been ‘completely’ absent from Dr. Fauci and official government agencies such as the CDC. Is it a conspiracy theory to believe that maintaining a healthy diet, weight and getting enough vitamin D ‘may’ improve your health outcome?

Dr. Charles Hoffe - Family Doctor / G.P.

As I explained in the 'about' section, my relative became short of breath and fatigued three days after having a covid vaccine. She went from walking 2 – 4 miles a day to barely walking to the end of the block with the assistance of a walker. She subsequently died on July 22nd, 2021.

I came across Dr. Hoffe’s video two days after her death and realized that what he describes happening to his vaccinated patients is ‘exactly what had happened to my relative.

In this video, Dr. Hoffe describes the mechanism by which he believes vaccines are damaging the vascular system of his patients. Results from a D-Dimer test indicate that 62% of his patients’ showed signs of micro-blood clotting between four and seven days after receiving a vaccination. Dr. Hoffe was relieved of his position for merely pointing this out.

Trying to remain objective, however, it is valid to ask if the risks of covid outweigh the risks from the vaccine. Two related studies are linked below. While it is now known that D-dimer levels are commonly elevated after a COVID-19 diagnosis, the question is, will repeated vaccine booster shots over time do more damage than simply getting COVID-19 and gaining nature immunity? Does the D-dimer test indicate micro-blood clotting after each booster shot? One and done might be much better than repeated damage caused by vaccines, and it remains to be seen. Finally, is an early treatment protocol advocated by many doctors a better long-term approach, at least for non-high-risk patients?

Elevated D-dimer levels common months after COVID-19 diagnosis

Laboratory testing for suspected COVID-19 vaccine–induced (immune) thrombotic thrombocytopenia

Robert F Kennedy Jr - Attorney

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the son of Robert F. Kennedy, has many questions about vaccine safety. As a result, the Center for Countering Digital Hate identified Kennedy as one of the main propagators of conspiracy theories about Bill Gates. Saying anything wrong about Bill Gates or the pharmaceutical industry is digital hate and is enough to get you banded on numerous social media platforms. Mr. Kennedy is yet another Harvard graduate to ask inconvenient questions about the pharmaceutical industry and the legal protection surrounding it.

In the included video, Kennedy discusses the funding and patents history of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with Dr. David Martin. It is claimed that the SARS vaccine was patented on March 2019, 8 months before the COVID-19 outbreak. The included video will require some concentration, but it is critical (in my view) to understanding the complex web of financial interests behind the vaccine(s) and perhaps even the creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself.

Make what you will of what Mr. Kennedy has to say; I take no strong position for or against his arguments at this time. I do plan to read Mr. Kennedy's latest book The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (Children's Health Defense).

I am curious to know what Mr. Kennedy is saying that is so dangerous that the CCDH does not want us to read it. I encourage you to do the same.

Dr. Paul E. Marik - Professor of medicine and services

With over 450 peer-reviewed journal articles to his credit, Dr. Paul Marik has nothing to gain by promoting the use of Ivermectin. Dr. Marik points out that Ivermectin has been prescribed to 3.7 billion people and is one of the safest drugs in the world. It is cheap at 2 cents per dose, and its effectiveness is documented in over 60 studies. Remdesivir, on the other hand, costs 3000 dollars per treatment and has virtually zero evidence that it is effective but is approved by the FDA. Dr. Marik’s conclusion is it comes down to money. The NIH receives money from on patents drugs and makes nothing from of off-patent drugs.

Judy Mikovits - PhD in biochemistry

Deep in the heart of conspiracy land is Dr. Judy Mikovits. Dr. Mikovits gained notoriety with her idea that the pandemic was, in fact, a plandemic. The video was removed from YouTube but is still on Rumble.

Before the pandemic, I would have put her in the camp of flat earthers, astrologists, and UFO believers. But the world has changed, and the US Military has since released video evidence of what is now calls unidentified aerial phenomena, so who knows. Also, in light of what has been revealed about how the NIH works from a funding point of view, I am no longer willing to dismiss everything she says automatically. However, I maintain a healthy skepticism of most of it.

Make of it what you will.

Dr. Peter Andrew McCullough - MD

Dr. Peter Andrew McCullough is an American cardiologist. He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University. He is editor-in-chief of the journals Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiorenal Medicine.

McCullough has published as of May 2029 over 40 peer-reviewed papers on COVID-19. He was the first Dr. to publish an outpatient early treatment protocol for COVID-19 and has been a proponent of the early treatment of COVID-19 using sequenced multi-drug therapy. Dr. M claims that 85% of all COVID-19 deaths in the US could have been prevented with early treatment, but instead, doctors were directed by the CDC to do nothing.

McCullough points out that age and obesity are the strongest determinates for death from COVID-19. Patients under 50 with no comorbidities could ride through this illness very quickly. He also points out that the Swedes figured this out very quickly and decided that shutting down did not make sense and instead focused on protecting the at-risk the best they could.

He explains how it has long been known that one drug alone can not treat HIV and says the same applies to COVID-19. McCullough. has been highly critical of the CDC, FDA, and the NIH's eagerness to promote relatively untested vaccines. He also points out that none of the CDC, FDA, and NIH bureaucrats have ever treated a single COVID-19 patient and have zero observational knowledge. McCullough believes there has been an active effort to discredit safe, cheap, and effective antivirals. He gives the example of the fraudulent study on Hydroxychloroquine published in The Lancet that and later retracted. A retraction from the Lancet is practically unheard of, by the way, with all the rigor applied before publications. I would like to know more about how this fraudulent study got through this process.

This is a long video, but if there is only one video you watch from start to finish, this is one I would recommend. The conclusions the Dr. comes to are shocking and have proven predictive.

Dr. Robert Malone - Virologist

Wow, you can’t make this stuff up. Dr. Malon, the inventor of mRNA technology, says the prevention of early treatment has cost hundreds of thousands of lives and may constitute crimes against humanity.

Over 5000 physicians have signed the PHYSICIANS DECLARATION .

Thousands of physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face of disease. Physicians are now advising their patients to simply go home (allowing the virus to replicate) and return when their disease worsens, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths, due to failure-to-treat

Dr. David Martin - PHD

Prepare for a deep dive into the patent history around the coronavirus. Dr. Martin has been following the patents around the SARS corona virus for 20 plus years. He said he had reviewed over 4000 patents and the financing of these patents. His conclusions are head-spinning if accurate. I remain neutral on this topic since I have not yet taken the time to investigate the issue thoroughly enough. I’ll get to it eventually.

The evidence has gathered may be used in Reiner Fuellmich's 'Crimes Against Humanity' case.

Nuremberg Trial 2.0
Johnson & Johnson Employees

Project Veritas captures what two Johnson and Johnson employees have to say about giving children vaccines.

Dr. Kary B. Mullis - Nobel prize for PCR test

Dr. Kary Mullis received his PH.D. in biochemistry from the University of California, Berkeley. He received the Nobel Prize for co-inventing the PCR test used to detect SARS-CoV-2.

Before Dr. Fauci became a household name, Dr. Mullis had some extremely disparaging things to say about Dr. Fauci. I could not agree with his assessment more.

I had to get this clip off of Rumble since YouTube automatically removes clips that casts Lord Fauci in a bad light. Truth is misinformation; misinformation is truth.

Dr. Mullis died just before (August 2019) the lab leak or natural emergence (if that is what you choose to believe) of SAR-CoV-2. It sure would be interesting to know what Dr. Mullis would have to say about Fauci’s handling of the pandemic, and I can only imagine.


Fauci doesn’t know anything about anything, and I would say that to his face.

He (Dr. Fauci) doesn’t understand medicine; he should not be in a position like he is in. Most of those people at the top are just total administrative people, and they don’t know anything about what is going on at the bottom. Those guys have an agenda that is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay them to take care of our health in some way. They have a personal kind of agenda; they make up their own rules as they go. Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly to the camera.

Dr. Luc Montagnier - Virologist - Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

Dr. Luc Montagnier received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus HIV.

Montagnier stated he believes SARS-CoV-2 was created in a lab and was immediately labeled a conspiracy theorist by many in the media and Wiki, too, of course. My view is the media will crash and burn on the natural origin theory as the case for a lab origin is much stronger.

Montagnier has also questioned the need for a vaccine in children whose long-term effects are unknown. He states that epigenetic alterations 'may' be passed down through the generations and, for this reason, thinks the idea of vaccinating children is outrageous given the unknown generational consequences. Having a cautious approach to a novel technology gets you the label of quack these days, even if you are a Nobel Price winner.

Jodi O’Malley - RN

Jodi O’Malley is a nurse who provided video evidence of what is going on behind the scenes regarding the vaccine in the hospital that she works.

When I saw this video, I, for the first time, felt a sense of rage. Rage because it brought back memories of ‘exactly’ my experience when I took my relative to the hospital to identify what was causing her to be out of breath and highly fatigued.

I told each doctor I talked to that her symptoms started three days after receiving the vaccine, and I told them that I thought it was Myocarditis. None of the doctors disputed my diagnosis, but none were willing to officially consider that her condition had anything to do with receiving the vaccine. I saw fear in their eyes, as though it would be career-ending if they correlated her situation to the vaccine. After her death, her primary care physician was unwilling to enter the case into the VAERS reporting system, and he said we will never know the caused of her death. After talking to several more doctors, I was given the same line, as if it were part of the standard response to events like this. I would add that this statement is true in part because no one looked into the cause of death. No one wanted to go against the vaccine as it would stain their reputation and might jeopardize their career was my take on the matter.

Since I do not think my experience was unique, I believe the number of deaths caused by the vaccine is vastly under-reported. To be clear, I do not fault doctors; I do, however, fault the system in which they are forced to work. They must follow hospital protocol and turn off their brain if they are to have a job.

You're a lawyer with no scientific background': Rand Paul attacks Sec. Becerra on vaccine mandates

In a past job as a software developer, I had to work closely with government regulators. Often, they could not articulate the regulation they were mandating and would, on a whim, change their interpretation of the regulation because they never took the time to understand it in the first place. They would say put the code in production (on the web where customer have access), and we will see if it meets the law. I found that most of the regulators were both stupid and drunk on power. Oh, I forgot to mention lazy.

I included this video because it reminded me of my past interactions with government regulators. In this case, the secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, had not heard of the Israeli study which demonstrated that natural immunity is robust and significantly better than vaccine immunity. It was an extensive high-quality study of great significance.

Rand Paul, an actual doctor, points out that Mr. Becerra, who has no medical or science background, was not even aware of the Israeli study and was mandating vaccines for those with natural immunity, contrary to past medical practices.

This interview especially irked me since my relative survived COVID-19 but died after receiving the vaccine. I wish more people could experience firsthand what I experienced with government regulators. They would then realize that many people working in the government have no idea what they are doing and could not make it in the private sector if their lives depended on it. I am sure there are some good ones, I, unfortunately, did not meet them.

Dr. David A. Relman - MD

Dr. David Relman is a graduate of MIT and Harvard medical school. He is currently a Professor in Medicine and Microbiology & Immunology at the Stanford University School of Medicine. This thoughtful ‘actual’ scientist is far from a quack conspiracy theorist. In my view, Dr. Relman gives an outstanding presentation on the merit or lack of merit for both the natural and lab leak origin of the SARS-COV-2 virus.

Important points Dr. Relman makes against a natural origin for SARS-COV-2 are as follows:
  1. SARS-CoV-2 closest known relative RaTG13 is 96.2 similar. While a 96.2% similarity might sound like it is a close relative, in terms of evolutionary time, you would have to go back tens of years to find a common ancestor.
  2. Many of the first cases of COVID-19 did not have a known exposure to the Wuhan wet market.
  3. Immediate ansestors of SARS-CoV-2 are missing.
  4. No natural host of SARS-CoV-2 has been found.
Important points Dr. Relman makes in favor of a Lab Leak origin are as follows:
  1. Geography, the first outbreaks occurred near the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
  2. Corona Virus research occurs at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has >19,000 bat samples.
  3. Gain-of-function research was carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was funded by the NIH.
  4. Chimeric viruses: Examined new spike proteins by swapping segments into bat SARSr-CoV WIV1.
  5. Biosafety of the Wuhan lab was only BL2, with BL4 as the highest.
  6. Lab accidents are much more comment than we know. One report showed over 1500 accidents have occurred between 2005 and 2013 in the US alone
  7. Three know leaks of the original SARS virus occurred in 2004.
  8. A serious lack of transparency from the Wuhan Institute of Virology regarding the research conducted.
  9. The Wuhan Institute of Virology took its virus sequence database offline in Sept of 2019.
  10. And more, please watch the video

Dr. Nathan Thompson

In software development, it is normal (often required) to get a baseline of a program's performance before making any changes. As incremental changes are made, you retest, so it is easy to identify what problems may have been introduced into the system.

In this video, Dr. Thompson does what in software land would be considered standard, he gives a long-term patient blood and immune system tests to get a baseline. After receiving the vaccine, he repeats the tests.

His findings are stunning, the Granulocytes skyrocket, indicating tissue damage, and the Lymphocyte and CD 8 cells plummet. Simply put, your natural immune system is gutted, and your ability to fight off things like cancer and virus is gutted as well.

The doctor points out that he would think the patient has an auto immune disease if he did not know about the vaccine. He continues that if the immune system has tanked after the vaccine, it should not be surprising that breakthrough cases follow.

So is the vaccine to blame for breakthrough cases and not the unvaccinated?

Dr. Micheal Yeadon - PhD in Pharmacology

Dr. Michael Yeadon is a pharmacologist who was the chief scientist and vice-president of Pfizer's allergy and respiratory research division. He also co-founded the biotechnology company Ziarco. In my view, this is a must-watch video.

Quick summary, Yeadon states that nearly everything you are told about SARS-CoV-2 is a lie, and he details each of these lies. He then challenges you to do research and find where he is wrong. Yeadon also gives some stark warnings about the true motivation behind governmental responses to the pandemic. My view is Dr. Yeadon has nothing to gain financially or personally by giving these warnings and strikes me as anything but a quack.

Dr. Zubin Damania

Antibody-dependent enhancement has been a hot topic surrounding the covid-19 vaccine. While it ‘was’ observed in the animal trials, it has not been observed in humans so far. Dr. Zubin Damani makes a compelling case against ADE occurring in humans. I remain neutral on the issue but find it informative to learn that the vaccine(s) were apparently released to the public before a definitive answer to this question was found and to my knowledge, there still is not a definitive answer. WFT.

Wiki ADE Except:

ADE was observed in animal studies during the development of coronavirus vaccines, but as of 14 December 2020 no incidents had been observed in human trials. "Overall, while ADE is a theoretical possibility with a COVID-19 vaccine, clinical trials in people so far have not shown that participants who received the vaccine have a higher rate of severe illness compared to participants who did not receive the vaccine."[28][29]